Exploring the 4 Property Rule
If you are looking to finance real estate, portfolio lending may be the way to go. One of the reasons for this is portfolio lending is not restricted to the new 4 property rule. With a portfolio lender, it is possible to finance an unlimited number of mortgages. However, those looking to get loans through conventional lenders such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will run into the 4 property rule.
Obviously new lending rules were needed to curb the losses of hundreds of lenders that are now out of business. But, in my opinion, the 4 property rule is ridiculous. In fact, this rule borders on Socialism. The 4 property rule severely hinders the ability of a real estate investor to continue doing business.
So, what specifically is the 4 property rule? Essentially, the new rules of conventional lending state that a person will be limited to four financed properties at one time. Again, this is a thoroughly absurd rule that undermines many benefits of real estate investing. Basically, if you are limited to only four financed homes, you can not flip property in vast numbers.
This type of rule does very little to help our economy recover. In my opinion, it is a form of Socialism. And, last time I looked we lived in a country founded on Capitalism. So, this rule overall does nothing to improve our situation and in fact the 4 property rule can significantly weaken our economy.
Before the subprime meltdown, investors took advantage of rapidly increasing real estate values. They would purchase properties at low prices and then sell high. Sometimes, real estate investors purchased huge volumes of properties to resell. The affordable housing they provided had a positive impact on our economy.
That is, in the absence of the 4 property rule, the sale of massive volumes of real estate would yield a number of positive effects. For example, the revenues generated could be invested into the stock market. Once invested, it would provide liquidity to many different companies. It would also generate significant tax revenue to the state and local governments. And, of course, the wealth created by this multiplexing of real estate sales would greatly expand purchasing. This would improve the economy in other sectors of the market. With the onset of the 4 property rule, all of this would cease and much of the economy could be undermined. Hopefully, this rule will eventually be revoked and return a more free market approach to the world of real estate.
Then again, regardless of whether or not this rule is revoked, portfolio lenders are not restricted to such a rule. If you wish to seek massive financing, a portfolio lender is the lender to visit.
Obviously new lending rules were needed to curb the losses of hundreds of lenders that are now out of business. But, in my opinion, the 4 property rule is ridiculous. In fact, this rule borders on Socialism. The 4 property rule severely hinders the ability of a real estate investor to continue doing business.
So, what specifically is the 4 property rule? Essentially, the new rules of conventional lending state that a person will be limited to four financed properties at one time. Again, this is a thoroughly absurd rule that undermines many benefits of real estate investing. Basically, if you are limited to only four financed homes, you can not flip property in vast numbers.
This type of rule does very little to help our economy recover. In my opinion, it is a form of Socialism. And, last time I looked we lived in a country founded on Capitalism. So, this rule overall does nothing to improve our situation and in fact the 4 property rule can significantly weaken our economy.
Before the subprime meltdown, investors took advantage of rapidly increasing real estate values. They would purchase properties at low prices and then sell high. Sometimes, real estate investors purchased huge volumes of properties to resell. The affordable housing they provided had a positive impact on our economy.
That is, in the absence of the 4 property rule, the sale of massive volumes of real estate would yield a number of positive effects. For example, the revenues generated could be invested into the stock market. Once invested, it would provide liquidity to many different companies. It would also generate significant tax revenue to the state and local governments. And, of course, the wealth created by this multiplexing of real estate sales would greatly expand purchasing. This would improve the economy in other sectors of the market. With the onset of the 4 property rule, all of this would cease and much of the economy could be undermined. Hopefully, this rule will eventually be revoked and return a more free market approach to the world of real estate.
Then again, regardless of whether or not this rule is revoked, portfolio lenders are not restricted to such a rule. If you wish to seek massive financing, a portfolio lender is the lender to visit.
About the Author:
Susan Lassiter-Lyons has been teaching real estate investors the secrets to investor loans since 2002. Her free report, The Death of Real Estate Investing, reveals how to find portfolio mortgages nationwide.
posted by Credit Counseling at
6:30 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home