UK Advance Bad Cash Credit Loan
This article looks at the way banks exploit customers with NSF and overdraft fees. It contrasts this with the other option known as payday or cash advances and proposes that these are in fact cheaper than bank fees. It goes on to show how banks lobby aggressively against the payday industry fearing cuts in there fees. The findings are based on a US study by the federal government and is freely down loadable.
This is an independent agency part of the federal government - created in 1933, just when thousands of banks failed. The 1920s and early 1930s saw thousands of banks fail. The FDIC is managed by a five-person Board of Directors, all of whom are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, with no more than three being from the same political party.
This study of overdraft programs began in 2006. It was initially a response to the banks growth of automated overdraft programs. This is a system where the bank honors customers obligations using computer rules to determine non-sufficient qualification for overdraft coverage. Data and information were gathered through a survey of a sample of institutions representing 1,171 FDIC-supervised banks, and a separate data request of customer account and transaction-level data from a smaller set of 39 institutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) published the results of a two year study on the use of overdraft programs operated by FDIC-supervised banks. The study found that a typical NSF check can result in overdraft fees and interest in excess of 3,500 percent APR. Customers in low income areas were more than likely twice as certain to incur these fees.
The FDIC study reinforces the payday loan industry's position that short-term cash advance loans are significantly less expensive than traditional bank overdraft fees. The study also found that, unlike payday loan companies that offer on-demand products, most banks (75.1 percent) automatically enrolled customers in overdraft programs that carry APRs and other fees far more expensive than the typical cash advance loan.
The FDIC study concluded that a typical bank customer repaying a $20 overdraft in two weeks would incur a $27 overdraft fee (the survey median) at an APR of 3,520 percent. A customer repaying a $60 ATM overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,173 percent and a customer repaying a $66 check overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,067 percent. Oddly enough the faster one pays down the overdraft the higher the APR turned out to be.
Some consumer advocacy groups like the CRL are lobbying to ban payday loans. This leaves customers with no option than to pay overdraft fees to the banks. CRL have led a charge to pass a law banning payday lending in Ohio. In 2006, Ken Compton, CEO of Advance America, said, "Contrary to the CRL's spin, responsible uses of the payday product provides consumers firm footing to overcome unexpected financial circumstances,".
Some key findings;
Over 90% of banks completed overdraft fees without informing the customer.Less than 8 percent of banks inform consumers that funds are insufficient before transactions are completed, offering the customers an opportunity to cancel the NSF transaction and avoid a fee.
Bank customers complaints about overdraft fees were received by twelve percent of banks.
About nine percent of bank customers have 10 or more NSF transactions per year. 4.9 percent had 20 or more NSF transactions. Customer accounts with 20 or more NSF transactions were charged $1,610 per year in NSF fees on average.
This is an independent agency part of the federal government - created in 1933, just when thousands of banks failed. The 1920s and early 1930s saw thousands of banks fail. The FDIC is managed by a five-person Board of Directors, all of whom are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, with no more than three being from the same political party.
This study of overdraft programs began in 2006. It was initially a response to the banks growth of automated overdraft programs. This is a system where the bank honors customers obligations using computer rules to determine non-sufficient qualification for overdraft coverage. Data and information were gathered through a survey of a sample of institutions representing 1,171 FDIC-supervised banks, and a separate data request of customer account and transaction-level data from a smaller set of 39 institutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) published the results of a two year study on the use of overdraft programs operated by FDIC-supervised banks. The study found that a typical NSF check can result in overdraft fees and interest in excess of 3,500 percent APR. Customers in low income areas were more than likely twice as certain to incur these fees.
The FDIC study reinforces the payday loan industry's position that short-term cash advance loans are significantly less expensive than traditional bank overdraft fees. The study also found that, unlike payday loan companies that offer on-demand products, most banks (75.1 percent) automatically enrolled customers in overdraft programs that carry APRs and other fees far more expensive than the typical cash advance loan.
The FDIC study concluded that a typical bank customer repaying a $20 overdraft in two weeks would incur a $27 overdraft fee (the survey median) at an APR of 3,520 percent. A customer repaying a $60 ATM overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,173 percent and a customer repaying a $66 check overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,067 percent. Oddly enough the faster one pays down the overdraft the higher the APR turned out to be.
Some consumer advocacy groups like the CRL are lobbying to ban payday loans. This leaves customers with no option than to pay overdraft fees to the banks. CRL have led a charge to pass a law banning payday lending in Ohio. In 2006, Ken Compton, CEO of Advance America, said, "Contrary to the CRL's spin, responsible uses of the payday product provides consumers firm footing to overcome unexpected financial circumstances,".
Some key findings;
Over 90% of banks completed overdraft fees without informing the customer.Less than 8 percent of banks inform consumers that funds are insufficient before transactions are completed, offering the customers an opportunity to cancel the NSF transaction and avoid a fee.
Bank customers complaints about overdraft fees were received by twelve percent of banks.
About nine percent of bank customers have 10 or more NSF transactions per year. 4.9 percent had 20 or more NSF transactions. Customer accounts with 20 or more NSF transactions were charged $1,610 per year in NSF fees on average.
About the Author:
Marsha Smythe is fascinated by the concept of APR and how banks can get away with charging such high amounts. He makes available on his blog downloads from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). These are a must read for anyone contemplating overdraft versus payday cash advances. Although US bank orientated the same rules apply to both UK payday cash advances and Canada payday cash.
posted by Credit Counseling at
2:52 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home